Mysterious Double Instance Hampering Performance - I study the existing code base. Confer with a colleague. Then I determine the optimal plan to change the functionality to load only a slice of all the dat...
Today I went out to get some lunch. When I got back, there were a flurry of emails from this tester. He said he used a test file to mock up some data for one of the processes. He ran the job to process the data, but nothing was happening. In the final email, he stated that this was a work stoppage.
A kind DBA took a look at the situation while I was gone. Turns out the process was waiting for the input file. I did a dive in, and found the data file was named wrong. I provided the correct name. I also specified the directory the file needed to be in, just in case. This got the tester past the problem.
Hey. I get that things will be tough if you are new. But don't sound the alarm that there is a work stoppage if you don't know what you are doing. That will only end up badly for you.
Next I find another email from the tester. He is trying to reconcile the results of the now successful job with another report. The problem is that the report has nothing to do with the process at hand. I send a quick reply back. In the reply, I stick to the facts. However I make it abundantly clear that the connections the tester is trying to make are not based in reality.